|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 6:21 am
yeah I know, people are too stuck in their ways to do anything as logical as unify the scouts. It's a shame. emo Oh I know it's not quite at the same level even today for the same kind of reasons the scouts are still seperate. But, one day.....I shall get one of those black and white spinney things they use to hypnotize people on cartoons and it shall all be better indeed.....yess......yess.........*shows her petting her cat from a behind camera view like Dr.Claw*
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 9:29 am
bluecherry yeah I know, people are too stuck in their ways to do anything as logical as unify the scouts. It's a shame. emo Oh I know it's not quite at the same level even today for the same kind of reasons the scouts are still seperate. But, one day.....I shall get one of those black and white spinney things they use to hypnotize people on cartoons and it shall all be better indeed.....yess......yess.........*shows her petting her cat from a behind camera view like Dr.Claw* eek OOOOO KITTY xd xp Yeah, one day we just need all the old a** wipes to retire and things will be better. Because I know that many a male and female wants unification..... I do because then the scouts would be AWESOME... emo We are like the only country on the planet that still has them seperate.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 05, 2006 5:39 am
You know, they should just one day say "out with the old! in with the new!" Dump all the current people in charge of every public power position- like governments, schools, scouts and such- and put new people, and I mean new as in not just a different name, in the spots. There will be a learning curve, many mistakes will be made at first while they're getting used to how the jobs work, but in a little while things should get better because the people will reflect the current era as opposed to that of the people's lives who lived their youth and set their standards back in the 50s.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 05, 2006 12:46 pm
bluecherry You know, they should just one day say "out with the old! in with the new!" Dump all the current people in charge of every public power position- like governments, schools, scouts and such- and put new people, and I mean new as in not just a different name, in the spots. There will be a learning curve, many mistakes will be made at first while they're getting used to how the jobs work, but in a little while things should get better because the people will reflect the current era as opposed to that of the people's lives who lived their youth and set their standards back in the 50s. Well I guess the question is will we be putting people who want jobs like that in those areas or just random people...
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 05, 2006 9:42 pm
No, I didn't elaborate upon this with specifics since it's a futile hairbrained scheme, but the idea would be putting in people who are interested, responsable, so on and so fourth-- basicly, these people most likely would be the ones who would have taken over the spots in the future any way--we're just putting them in sooner while they're still young, before it's too late and they're old too and it's "you can't teach an old dog a new trick" all over again.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 05, 2006 11:30 pm
bluecherry No, I didn't elaborate upon this with specifics since it's a futile hairbrained scheme, but the idea would be putting in people who are interested, responsable, so on and so fourth-- basicly, these people most likely would be the ones who would have taken over the spots in the future any way--we're just putting them in sooner while they're still young, before it's too late and they're old too and it's "you can't teach an old dog a new trick" all over again. Hmmm true that way we are not 40 years behind in the government.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 07, 2006 12:45 pm
exactly. We'd finally have the governing body in sync with those their governing.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 07, 2006 3:12 pm
bluecherry exactly. We'd finally have the governing body in sync with those their governing. I don't think it would stay in sync that long personally.... Because most of the people would eventually stop advanceing... and we would fall behind ONCE again
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2006 9:36 am
yes, so if we find we've failed to keep up the maitnence and keep switching to newer people if the old prove outdated, we do it all over again when that time comes. Worst comes to worst, at least it was better for a little while instead of never having been.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 09, 2006 7:55 am
bluecherry yes, so if we find we've failed to keep up the maitnence and keep switching to newer people if the old prove outdated, we do it all over again when that time comes. Worst comes to worst, at least it was better for a little while instead of never having been. Hmmm yeah we could do that... but I don't think it would be the greatest idea still. I would rather have a stable government who is behind then an unstable government who is current... but that is just me
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 09, 2006 11:23 pm
They're stable currently? hehe, well more then the new would be sure, but they also aren't great either. Oh well, it wouldn't happen any way xd
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 10, 2006 8:24 am
bluecherry They're stable currently? hehe, well more then the new would be sure, but they also aren't great either. Oh well, it wouldn't happen any way xd Nope not without some serious war and stuff.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|