|
|
| What is currently, our most important task? |
| Manifesto |
|
100% |
[ 6 ] |
| Constitution |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| Membership |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| Other |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sat Jan 07, 2006 4:20 pm
I would suggest removing "Join the Novos party, and grow in power." from the front page. The "grow in power" part doesn't really present the correct message to newcomers.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 07, 2006 7:37 pm
Myslec Do you want a vote? I'll support that subforum.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 07, 2006 8:02 pm
Membership is our biggest problem, and a subforum on the issue would not be unwarranted.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 07, 2006 11:19 pm
Aperium Membership is our biggest problem, and a subforum on the issue would not be unwarranted. Agreed. Although it may not be our most immediate problem.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2006 6:59 am
Fenris Claiborne Aperium Membership is our biggest problem, and a subforum on the issue would not be unwarranted. Agreed. Although it may not be our most immediate problem. Fenris Claiborne The constitution should probably be our highest priority at the moment imo. We need to get a formal organization system into place, and after that we can begin to form task groups (or whatever) for the carrying out of individual portions of the Constitution. Fenris Claiborne It would seem our largest problem still is membership, or the lack of to be precise. In that case, perhaps the discussion is whether to make the subforum about the constitution or membership. I believe that both are sorely needed, it is just a question of which is the most urgent.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2006 11:45 am
Aperium Fenris Claiborne Aperium Membership is our biggest problem, and a subforum on the issue would not be unwarranted. Agreed. Although it may not be our most immediate problem. Fenris Claiborne The constitution should probably be our highest priority at the moment imo. We need to get a formal organization system into place, and after that we can begin to form task groups (or whatever) for the carrying out of individual portions of the Constitution. Fenris Claiborne It would seem our largest problem still is membership, or the lack of to be precise. In that case, perhaps the discussion is whether to make the subforum about the constitution or membership. I believe that both are sorely needed, it is just a question of which is the most urgent. I believe that we have enough gold for both. The Constitution could be one thread or a forum. The thread would need to view one topic at a time, while the forum could hold multiple discussions and would go much faster. I'd vote for the constitution forum.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2006 12:06 pm
Myslec Aperium Fenris Claiborne Aperium Membership is our biggest problem, and a subforum on the issue would not be unwarranted. Agreed. Although it may not be our most immediate problem. Fenris Claiborne The constitution should probably be our highest priority at the moment imo. We need to get a formal organization system into place, and after that we can begin to form task groups (or whatever) for the carrying out of individual portions of the Constitution. Fenris Claiborne It would seem our largest problem still is membership, or the lack of to be precise. In that case, perhaps the discussion is whether to make the subforum about the constitution or membership. I believe that both are sorely needed, it is just a question of which is the most urgent. I believe that we have enough gold for both. The Constitution could be one thread or a forum. The thread would need to view one topic at a time, while the forum could hold multiple discussions and would go much faster. I'd vote for the constitution forum. Deviant We have 8058g with a sub-forum costing 2500. So we can afford 3.2 new sub-forums As one subforum has already been created it appears that we can afford 2.2 more... May I propose that we do indeed make both suggested subfourms? UPDATE: After donations from Myslec and myself, the guild account now contains 7500 gold. I believe that allows us to form 3.0 new subforums.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2006 1:38 pm
Aperium Myslec Aperium Fenris Claiborne Aperium Membership is our biggest problem, and a subforum on the issue would not be unwarranted. Agreed. Although it may not be our most immediate problem. Fenris Claiborne The constitution should probably be our highest priority at the moment imo. We need to get a formal organization system into place, and after that we can begin to form task groups (or whatever) for the carrying out of individual portions of the Constitution. Fenris Claiborne It would seem our largest problem still is membership, or the lack of to be precise. In that case, perhaps the discussion is whether to make the subforum about the constitution or membership. I believe that both are sorely needed, it is just a question of which is the most urgent. I believe that we have enough gold for both. The Constitution could be one thread or a forum. The thread would need to view one topic at a time, while the forum could hold multiple discussions and would go much faster. I'd vote for the constitution forum. Deviant We have 8058g with a sub-forum costing 2500. So we can afford 3.2 new sub-forums As one subforum has already been created it appears that we can afford 2.2 more... May I propose that we do indeed make both suggested subfourms? UPDATE: After donations from Myslec and myself, the guild account now contains 7500 gold. I believe that allows us to form 3.0 new subforums. Thanks to Defunct Adjectives we now have enough for 4.0 subforums.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2006 6:15 pm
And now enough for 5.
A constitution sub-forum would be excellent, as we have lots and lots of ground to cover and it would clog the first page immensely.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2006 8:22 pm
It seems settled then, whoever has access to Novos Account can set it up. I'd do it myself but I don't have the new password at the moment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2006 9:05 pm
Back again.
So, I'm wondering whether we really should create a subforum for the constitution. Once we have all the topics organized into subforums, we COULD use the main page for the constitution. I'm not sure. What are we planning on using the main forum for once this is all organized anyhow?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2006 10:25 pm
Anything that doesn't go into the sub forums pretty much; political discussions, chatterbox threads, miscellaneous guild issues, etc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2006 11:12 pm
Recruitment and Constitution forums added.
Note to anyone adding Forums: when you click on the "purchase a new forum" link, it automatically creates a sub-forum (and then asks if you want to create one sweatdrop ), so if you follow through with the entire process you will ,in fact, create 2 sub-forums. Which is why we now have a constitution forum, which was a popular suggestion I saw.
Some of you will now have access to the novos account, please keep this in mind while creating sub-forums.
Front Page Updated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2006 12:37 am
Aeridea Back again. So, I'm wondering whether we really should create a subforum for the constitution. Once we have all the topics organized into subforums, we COULD use the main page for the constitution. I'm not sure. What are we planning on using the main forum for once this is all organized anyhow? AERI! *glomp-huggles* Though, considering how many separate articles we are going to be going through 1 by 1, I think it'll be much easier just to give it a sub-forum, as it allows us to make an individual thread for each piece; and doing that on the main page could be a hassle.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
