|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Mon Nov 28, 2005 8:41 am
Don't let other monsters bite you. 3nodding
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 28, 2005 1:38 pm
November 27, 2005
Thaddeus There's more to life than death.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 29, 2005 7:22 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Dec 03, 2005 10:27 pm
December 4, 2005
Podeman Haru Mania You're not a redneck, you're a frat boy. They're the same thing, it's just one doesn't have a wife to beat when he gets home.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2005 6:27 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2005 8:04 am
The redneck beats his wife. Frat boys beat their girlfriends.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2005 9:16 am
Phil Srobeighn The redneck beats his wife. Frat boys beat their girlfriends. That is correct. One can only assume that the life's ambition of most frat boys is to manage to get married to their girlfriends, thereby being promoted to the coveted position of redneck. ... Incidentally, are rednecks considered monsters? And if not, is there some kind of legal precedent that might indicate we could beging classifying them as such?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2005 11:02 am
Archmage Phil Srobeighn The redneck beats his wife. Frat boys beat their girlfriends. That is correct. One can only assume that the life's ambition of most frat boys is to manage to get married to their girlfriends, thereby being promoted to the coveted position of redneck. ... Incidentally, are rednecks considered monsters? And if not, is there some kind of legal precedent that might indicate we could beging classifying them as such? as to the first, wouldn't being married theoretically restrict their drinking/hell raising? I certainly think it would... and to the second, sadly much work is underway to get "red necks" to be considered something of an ethnic class of their own, so it would be discrimination if we did. Not that discrimination, nor indeed blatent racism has ever stopped us from doing something before.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2005 11:30 am
Well that would mean that they aren't an ethnic group yet and our gov't keeps away from retroactive laws as far I can tell so you should get some quality slaying time in before the redneck activist groups have ammunition to slow you down with.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2005 2:28 pm
Shokushu Well that would mean that they aren't an ethnic group yet and our gov't keeps away from retroactive laws as far I can tell so you should get some quality slaying time in before the redneck activist groups have ammunition to slow you down with. Good point, Sho. *kicks redneck*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2005 7:51 pm
Jon-OH as to the first, wouldn't being married theoretically restrict their drinking/hell raising? I certainly think it would... Well, in theory, yes, that's how it would work, however, in reality, what happens is that the shift from frat boy to redneck merely causes a shift in habitat and behavior, centering the drinking and hell-raising inward. At this point, almost all of it happens within the home rather than "out with buddies." This is actually what neccesitates the need to have a wife in the first place, so that that hell-raising instinct can have an outlet in getting drunk and, subsequently, beating her. ... In conclusion, I would like to apologize for the amount of commas in that first paragraph. That was ridiculous, even for me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 06, 2005 6:44 am
Commas, life's great, incredible gift to us, mankind, all, are, without any, all, or complete doubt, perhaps, the best, most useful tools, in the history of this great, big world, ever.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 06, 2005 3:20 pm
Horray! I'm funny and/or quotable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 06, 2005 4:41 pm
"And/or" being the opperative conjunction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2005 10:05 am
December 11, 2005
Jon-Oh James T. Kirk's so manly he can have copulations with a small Japanese man and still be the manliest man who ever manned a man.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
