|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sun Jun 12, 2005 9:17 am
Livingnothing I am a little confused as well, is this a Q & A or a guide to the Guide?
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 12, 2005 9:39 am
Okies ... I understand more now......Yeap a darker or brighter color would work great on fonts.........
Now for the first question twisted
Which came first the Chicken or EGG? cool
(no more crazy questions from others)
I think this will be a great thread.......
Truebliss just be sure not to lead people off in bad directions with answers!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 12, 2005 10:36 am
[ Message temporarily off-line ]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 12, 2005 11:20 am
DLASTBIRD Okies ... I understand more now......Yeap a darker or brighter color would work great on fonts......... Now for the first question twisted Which came first the Chicken or EGG? cool (no more crazy questions from others)I think this will be a great thread....... Truebliss just be sure not to lead people off in bad directions with answers!
Indeed this question is not so crazy as it may seem.
Before we can begin this question, we must look up the definitions of both "the chicken" and "the egg". Since of coarse, I found the definition for chicken on pg. 140 of my dictionary and the word egg on page 277 of my dictionary, then it is very clear to my eyes that the chicken indeed came first. xd
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Edit: Being more realistic, I should probably give you more appropriate answers to this age-old question:
It all depends upon how you word the question and of coarse what your beliefs are. The correct answer to this question is that there is no truly right answer.
So, are we talking about any"egg" or a "chicken egg"? (Different Perspectives Between This Philosophical Question)
If you look at this question from a scientific way, in the perspective of a "chicken egg" then through DNA and evolution the egg came first. But how do you know that? Firstly, an animal like a chicken presumably evolved from another early life form being consistent with the evolution theory. (I am in no way saying that this theory of evolution is correct, however to look at this concept we must look at the scientific perspective of life). This brings us to the conclusion that before that chicken DNA was created from two "non-chicken" specimens there was no such animal as a chicken, meaning that the egg came first.
If you look at this question in a religious sense, then your theory would be relevant to the creation story. In this perspective God made all of the animals/plants on the earth so, undoubtedly the chicken had to come first. (I am in no way saying that this theory of creation is correct, but to look at this perspective we must look at the religious perspective of life).
Finally, If you look at the "egg" in general, and not at whether it is a "chicken egg", then Dinosaurs laid eggs before chickens had evolved. Something that laid eggs evolved into a chicken. So, since the concept of laying eggs was relevant way before chickens where around then the egg must have came first.
These are just a few theories that I could think of, and truthfully I could go on all day about this topic, but i'm sure this is enough for now. (:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 12, 2005 11:32 am
[ Message temporarily off-line ]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 12, 2005 2:59 pm
here's a good question: when will I finish the commons section?
xd
nice thread Blissy! keep up the good work.... heart
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 12, 2005 3:52 pm
WishBringer here's a good question: when will I finish the commons section?
xd
nice thread Blissy! keep up the good work.... heart
The answer to that question is in fact very simple. The commons list will never be fully done, as Gaia is always adding new pixilated wonders for all of us lucky folks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 12, 2005 5:35 pm
sorry, must ask a completely silly question...
if money does not grow on trees, then how came a bank has branches?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 12, 2005 8:20 pm
Why does Deoxy love Truebliss?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 12, 2005 10:13 pm
When will the archiving be done... i dun wanna talk in the guild... kowaii desu!!! crying
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 12, 2005 11:29 pm
Kawaii_Hime_Ceres sorry, must ask a completely silly question... if money does not grow on trees, then how came a bank has branches?
Banks deal with whole numbers. Whole numbers have square
roots. Since the trees roots are square, of course the trees will not grow anything and thus have branches. cool
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 12, 2005 11:37 pm
Rustoneal Why does Deoxy love Truebliss? Quote: Sweet golden hair easily lost in her eyes i become her beauty contained within an album
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 12, 2005 11:43 pm
WishBringer When will the archiving be done... i dun wanna talk in the guild... kowaii desu!!! crying
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 13, 2005 3:04 am
Cool . Um..............do you know how much the gold the bass'ken trophy is worth ? i would check the F.I.S.H. price guide but that is down for a while . I'm hoping you would know .
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 13, 2005 3:46 am
xTrueBlissx Kawaii_Hime_Ceres sorry, must ask a completely silly question... if money does not grow on trees, then how came a bank has branches?
Banks deal with whole numbers. Whole numbers have square
roots. Since the trees roots are square, of course the trees will not grow anything and thus have branches. cool interesting thought. heart
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
