|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 28, 2004 3:16 pm
I agree. Plus, she spelled Megadeth wrong. gonk That doesn't help.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 28, 2004 3:29 pm
Yeah...did you just ask her for bands she liked, or classic rock bands? Maybe this one is better to let go...
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 28, 2004 9:38 pm
I can't remember. I think I just asked for other bands. But I think we better just say no. For the good of the guild. gonk
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 29, 2004 1:29 pm
Yes, let's please do that. 3nodding You know what they say..."Quality over quantity". xp
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 29, 2004 9:02 pm
Aaaaaagreed. Ahh, feels good to deny someone. Hehe.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Sep 30, 2004 1:23 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 09, 2004 4:47 am
Any opinion on the two people waiting to be accepted? I think the one who talked about CDs is okay, except they did mention Nirvana. Not do sure about the other one, though.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 09, 2004 5:48 pm
MetalHead76 Any opinion on the two people waiting to be accepted? I think the one who talked about CDs is okay, except they did mention Nirvana. Not do sure about the other one, though. Hmm...I'm not sure either. They're fine, as long as they don't try to discuss Nirvana here. It's your call. Just keep in mind that if it DOES come to one of us making a mistake, there's always the option to ban. xp
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 28, 2004 7:43 pm
Yes, banning is an option. I would just feel bad making them pay their way into the guild just to be kicked out later.
But it's their own fault.. They should've read the rules.
At least I think I have rules posted on the main page..
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 02, 2004 6:33 am
Now I have the rules on the front page. sweatdrop
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 02, 2004 1:53 pm
That's good. And I'm happy to announce (not really...) we have officially recieved our first spam thread. xd (You'll know which one I'm talking about when you see my post in it)
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 12, 2004 9:28 pm
I was just coming here to compliment you on the handling of that thread.
It was sweet.
I'm so proud. Our very first spam thread.
I've been lazy with joining criteria lately.. All of the people with good grammar never have enough gold to join the guild when I accept them. gonk gonk
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2004 8:44 am
From now on I'm going to edit any posts that have horrible grammar. Well, at least the first posts in threads. I just did the Pink Floyd one.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 14, 2004 2:28 pm
Are you serious? xd Editing the post so you can tell what the ******** they're saying is I'm guessing what you mean. That's a good idea, or it seems like one..yet, somehow, it's not fair to the other people here. We need to be able to identify the morons to pick on, kind of like at the metal forum. xp Albeit, I admit that I HAVE found one or two here, who use good grammar. Not mentioning any names, though.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 14, 2004 2:45 pm
You feel that because you have mod powers that you can be an almighty God? Editing people's posts is the rudest thing you can ever do. If you don't like the way someone types, inform them of such. Don't edit their post without any explanation. And I'm sure you could "tell what the ******** she was saying", but it was just bad grammar at use.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|