|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2004 12:21 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2004 1:07 pm
Gracefallen kenluth_warrior As long as it's only temporary, I don't see a need to PM any mods.
When he gets banned for a month, we won't have to PM a mod either. A monthlong ban is only temporary as well, after all
And so it goes on and on until one day, woops, he's been banned permanently. confused Medieval91 (2:51:00 PM): miyuki said in the PM, which i've deleted, that if anyone ever reports me again, she will delete my account without even investigating. Delara29 (2:51:07 PM): ... Delara29 (2:51:10 PM): why did you delete that? Medieval91 (2:51:21 PM): I didn't mean to.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2004 1:25 pm
What kind of bullshit is that?
This is just not ******** fair. Now any mental wuss offended by a slightest thing can report him. What's worse, if miyuki isn't going to investigate it, that means that Medieval can be banned for something that isn't even his fault. I mean, wow. Isn't it her damn duty to investigate such cases? I'm not even saying that he got banned for a joke.
I wonder if we can report moderators.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2004 1:25 pm
The original "you've been banned" PM (the bolded words were her doing): miyuki Your topic named: There will be no programming in THIS house, woman! This topic had been removed from this forum. Your post had been deleted due to a violation of the Terms of Service. On Gaia Online we encourage a friendly atmosphere which all users are expected to be respectful to each other. Subsequent messages like this will result of your account being blocked from this site. If you have any questions, contact a Gaia Online moderator with reference number 3467526 Additional notes: From the ToS: The User may not: upload, post, email, graphically portray, or otherwise make available any Content that is unlawful, harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, libelous, invasive of another's privacy, hateful, racist or otherwise objectionable. Excuse me? She admits that it's obviously a joke, but still considers it "unlawful," "harmful," "threatening," and "abusive"? I'm also pretty sure she needs a dictionary because I can only assume she doesn't know the meaning of "defamatory" or "vulgar." "Hateful"? You've got to be kidding me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2004 1:32 pm
And this is yet another reason for us to do something about it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2004 1:37 pm
natawa What kind of bullshit is that? This is just not ******** fair. Now any mental wuss offended by a slightest thing can report him. What's worse, if miyuki isn't going to investigate it, that means that Medieval can be banned for something that isn't even his fault. I mean, wow. Isn't it her damn duty to investigate such cases? I'm not even saying that he got banned for a joke. I wonder if we can report moderators. It gets even more retarded when you consider that he has only had a total of two tempbans and one warning (which they admitted was a mistake, and he asked them to remove it from his record). I know they will permaban your a** if you're constantly getting tempbanned, but he has only been tempbanned twice. I really wish he hadn't accidentally deleted the PM. I would have posted direct quotes from miyuki in Q&F and asked if this is really the way a mod should behave.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2004 1:49 pm
Meh, now we can't do anything about that. But we can post a thread asking about her reasoning. If she denies that PM, it'll just prove how full of s**t she really is.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2004 8:01 pm
^^Where was the thread in question posted?^^
::edit:: ^^I asked this because I was hoping for the answer "Chatterbox," but I now realize it doesn't really matter so I shall post my idea...^^
^^I suggest that we - the entire guild or just a select few, either way works - save that post in Notepad, or some other computer text document. We will use it as a referance(making damn sure Miyuki's name is brought up every time) when we report every "You suck," "I'm God," "I hate []," and any other thread that could be concidered trolling in any way, shape or form, to a Moderator. We will demand an immediate banning - the idea of no warnings comes from the fact that DJ didn't get any - of the user who posted the thread, along with anyone posting in the thread in agreement with the original poster for trolling. Any and all failures to do so goes on the record - complete with the name of the Mod and a list of the original post in the thread and all responses that were reported with it - and once the list of Mods who failed to do their duty gets long enough, post it in the Q&F and - because said thread will inevitably be deleted, but at least it will have gotten some attention - e-mailed directly to Lanzer, L0cke, or another Administrator.^^
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2004 8:29 pm
Delara I really wish he hadn't accidentally deleted the PM. I would have posted direct quotes from miyuki in Q&F and asked if this is really the way a mod should behave. Well, if Conrad is indeed sure about what she exactly said, you'd be able to get away with creating certain quotes manually. Just hope no one asks for the PM itself. xd
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 28, 2004 2:14 am
Delara Gracefallen kenluth_warrior As long as it's only temporary, I don't see a need to PM any mods.
When he gets banned for a month, we won't have to PM a mod either. A monthlong ban is only temporary as well, after all
And so it goes on and on until one day, woops, he's been banned permanently. confused Medieval91 (2:51:00 PM): miyuki said in the PM, which i've deleted, that if anyone ever reports me again, she will delete my account without even investigating. Delara29 (2:51:07 PM): ... Delara29 (2:51:10 PM): why did you delete that? Medieval91 (2:51:21 PM): I didn't mean to. I really don't get it. Since when does a moderator make a statement like that? If only dj medieval had saved the post, we could have sent it to Lanzer and demanded that she be stripped of her right as Chatterbox Mod.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 28, 2004 2:38 am
Lilith Tsutomo Delara Gracefallen kenluth_warrior As long as it's only temporary, I don't see a need to PM any mods.
When he gets banned for a month, we won't have to PM a mod either. A monthlong ban is only temporary as well, after all
And so it goes on and on until one day, woops, he's been banned permanently. confused Medieval91 (2:51:00 PM): miyuki said in the PM, which i've deleted, that if anyone ever reports me again, she will delete my account without even investigating. Delara29 (2:51:07 PM): ... Delara29 (2:51:10 PM): why did you delete that? Medieval91 (2:51:21 PM): I didn't mean to. I really don't get it. Since when does a moderator make a statement like that? If only dj medieval had saved the post, we could have sent it to Lanzer and demanded that she be stripped of her right as Chatterbox Mod. Haha! Chatterbox Mod. Isn't this an oxymoron? xp Regardless, this is all just plain wrong - and the worst part of it all is - no matter how much any of us b***h or moan, because of Miyuki's admin status, our opinions won't be worth a pound of goat s**t. It's a real shame that that private message was lost. That could probably have proven to be the key when taking the initiative to pursue this. Meanwhile, who's up for creating a new guild? How about the Organized Revolution of Gaians Against Stupid Moderators - or ORGASM, for short. Our flag could be a female Gaian's battered mug (strikingly similar to Miyuki's) covered in the remains of what must of been an overnight bukkake-fest. But I jest...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 28, 2004 2:55 am
Or... we could reform our Paramilitary force, and change it's purpose from 'flaming the ever-loving bejesus out of morons', to 'rebelling against stupid moderators in order to make the Chatterbox a better place'.
Or we could just join the anti-moderators guild, leaded by Samael.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 28, 2004 6:45 am
natawa Or we could just join the anti-moderators guild, leaded by Samael. Well, it was led by Samael, then Samael quit Gaia. confused Not much is going on over there. People rarely post, and the join request I put in around the time this mess happened has so far neither been accepted or declined. (Technically that's not that important; it's a public guild, so I don't need to be a member to post. I just want to be a member before I post.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 28, 2004 10:33 am
Samael? I wonder why regulars are quitting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 29, 2004 1:46 am
natawa Samael? I wonder why regulars are quitting. Perhaps they found some sort of greatness in the real world? Or they're dead? XD Yeah, I know, I'm going to Hell for that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
