|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Mar 24, 2006 5:52 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 25, 2006 5:52 pm
God I hate when people are so damn close minded
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Mar 26, 2006 6:37 pm
Winds of Creation Yellow Shirt MetalMetal songs sung by people who wear yellow shirts. Most songs by bands who play in this genre, are very bright and uplifting--just like yellow shirts! Lyrical content includes singing about the shade of goldenrod of your shirt, and your disgust for people with green or blue shirts. That is very similar to the East vs West thing that went on in the rap community. But this isn't rap, this is hardcore metal. About yellow shirts. hahahaha this guy is the best xd
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 02, 2006 11:49 pm
Orizion Harvested Sorrow Jazz, much like classical, has a certain stigma attached to it. That's the way it is. Many people haven't heard much or any jazz but they assume they don't like it based on what they've heard about it, or because it's "old people's music". Some also don't like the instrumentation, because they like rock oriented ensembles (an electric guitar or two, bass, drums, vocalist) and aren't used to wind instruments like saxophones which is what jazz is to them. They don't even have any idea that jazz fusion exists. That makes sense. 3nodding Harvested Sorrow Of course, there are people who know what jazz is and simply don't like the whole concept of it being based around soloing. To some this is simply musical masturbation and has no compositional value. Eewww. So, tell me more about this wonderful death metal. I'm intrigued now that you say that my ignorance is like the other person's ignorance of jazz. You're claiming it's one chord with unintelligible screaming over the top. This is false. Early death metal was simple, and brutal, as it was meant to be, however, it was NEVER one chord material. Metal, as a whole is based upon using sets of riffs, so by default it can't be anything like you described. (I realize that was probably hypberbole, however, it isn't the three chord per song stuff you're thinking of, either) Some later death metal is very difficult material to pull off properly on a technical and emotional level (such as Atheist and Gorguts' Obscura) even taking heavy jazz and classical influences at times, and the vocals range from the low grunts you speak of to higher range material. Some also focuses (wonderfully) on creating an atmosphere rather than technical ability of the musicians. Tell me, what death metal bands have you heard?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 02, 2006 11:50 pm
kila_chan http://www.gaiaonline.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=7739319 Unfortunately, the description in that topic doesn't begin to do any in-depth coverage of the genre or make any listing of the best material from the genre's prime (with a few exceptions).
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 12, 2006 5:56 pm
Jazz is conversational by nature. I mean, just sit down with a good recording and listen to the solos.
That takes thought.
Most often, the people who don't like jazz generally don't like much thought to their conversations.
That's a major generalization though.
In my opinion, music is music. There's music everywhere. Whether its "that noise" coming from the car next to you, or even just the particular cadence and phrasing of human speech, music is everywhere.
Another reason people sometimes don't like jazz is because they just don't get it.
Music as we know has evolved over centuries. Jazz is merely another form its taken. A form with its own distinct harmonies.
Let's look at the 7th chord. THis is actually pretty interesting. I asked my sax teacher why the dominant 7th got so popular. He mentioned something about part of it going back to the old black spirituals. The slaves of the south tried to convey their culture and emotions in ways that their current world would understand. As they were exposed to western music, they began to introduce their own cultural influences. Most noticeably was a bend in pitch, about a half step. (I really can't explain how he did it, but he sang a little spiritual phrase that, given my experience with jazz, began to sound more and more bluesy)
> < poor explanation on my part, i know.
My point is that learning about the history of jazz harmony and essentially jazz theory gave me a greater appreciation for the music I love.
Someone who thinks that jazz is just pounding random chords in a smokey piano bar wouldn't get that.
It's true, jazz does get pretty experimental, but that's the fun part. Why do we like Giant Steps so much. The melody is hardly impressive. It's the harmony that gets you. I mean, its thirds. Thirds! That's interesting.
I don't get that kind of interest when i listen to the stuff on the radio. I don't get that when I listen to my friend's death metal, or his "fat beats."
Again, I'm going back to the conversational aspect of jazz. A long time favorite among fans.
People don't like instrumental music as much now. WHy's that? Do you absolutely need words to get the message of the song out. No. The fact that there are so many emotionally charged songs w/o a single sung syllable amazes me. That's another thing I find interesting about jazz.
The degree of control over pathos.
It takes a lot more skill to get a powerful message out, w/o explicitly saying it.
And as for the "complex harmonies" thing. Sure, some people make some complex harmonies for death metal.
So what. Technical complexity isn't everything. In terms of overall simplicity the song that gets me the most is Gershwin's They Can't Take that Away from Me. What a great song. It's so simple. What's better is that Gershwin was able to make something that when played well, is immensely emotional, but when played not as well, is still pretty damn good. It's hard to mess it up.
A song with noticeably more complex harmonies, but a simpler melody ( i mean like two or three real ideas throughout) is Aguas de Marco, or Waters of March. Though the melody, the face, of the song doesn't do much moving, the song goes through all kinds of emotional hurdles.
(On a side note, look up the lyrics for that song. I know i asked you guys to in another thread, but just look up the lyrics for how they relate to this. That song has the best lyrics I've ever heard. It's just a bunch of haunting images. Never actually says what its about)
What this Orizion wrote about is merely a compositional concept hardly unique to death metal.
That's what I think is so funny about it.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 15, 2006 10:39 am
As I covered, what he wrote about is a compositional concept that's not used in death metal, ever.
Actually, when I think about it, you'd be hard pressed to find any music that used one chord with growling over the top.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 15, 2006 12:02 pm
One of my friends who's insanely into death metal even admits that he has to give credit where it's due to jazz.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 16, 2006 5:30 am
One of metal's primary influences is jazz so it's not surprising.
Besides that...if he listens to Atheist for example, yeah, he's gonna have to give credit to jazz. (HUGE jazz fusion influence)
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 16, 2006 5:45 am
I like fusion. Idk why so many of my friends dislike it.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 16, 2006 6:04 am
Because if they don't like jazz they won't like fusion? ninja
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 16, 2006 6:56 am
No, these are my jazz inclined friends. Two members of my combo in particular.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Apr 17, 2006 5:28 am
Ash Rail I like fusion. Idk why so many of my friends dislike it. Many people hate fusion because it "breaks away" from traditional ideas of music. That's why people hate it. They probably don't like jazz-funk or jazz-rock because it gears away from "jazz" and instead goes towards "funk" "RnB" or "Rock". I agree with Sorrow, fusion-jazz is one of the primary influences of rock (in general).
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Apr 17, 2006 6:32 am
I like fusion, and I like blues.
The only offshoot of jazz I don't really care for is smooth jazz. Some of it is fine. This one band, I think called Spyro Jyro, is interesting. That and there are some phenominal players who do smooth jazz. Still, I just can't really get into it.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 21, 2006 6:08 pm
Ash Rail I like fusion, and I like blues. The only offshoot of jazz I don't really care for is smooth jazz. Some of it is fine. This one band, I think called Spyro Jyro, is interesting. That and there are some phenominal players who do smooth jazz. Still, I just can't really get into it. I don't like smooth jazz either, I believe it appeals to more modern audiences than the previous jazz movements.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|