|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 06, 2009 9:10 pm
They support the Idea as much as every one in this guild but to me they seem to have giving the cause a bad name i was hated on by my gf's family because i said the idea's of Engles and Marx work and its sad when i see people who think we are bad people i say force them outta the party or give them a less say in matters
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 06, 2009 9:40 pm
Louis-Auguste Robespierre Kotka agrees with the idea of the Feminist-Marxists who say that marxism inadequately explains women's oppression and wants to bring alien class ideology in to explain it. No, no I didn't. And I specifically said this WASN'T the case. No aliens here. 'feminist ideology' is pretty much a meaningless thing to say... so yeah, there's nothing TO import. It is only conservatives who think saying 'the feminists think/say...' means a damn thing. I'm not saying you lack anything. And go ahead and reject 'feminist' for yourself. Just stop falsely defining ittttttttt. -_- Anyway. (Sorry, OT. ^^ But seriously, stop contradicting every thing I've ever read on the subject of what feminism is and I'll leave you alone.)
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 06, 2009 10:16 pm
Comrade Kotka Louis-Auguste Robespierre Kotka agrees with the idea of the Feminist-Marxists who say that marxism inadequately explains women's oppression and wants to bring alien class ideology in to explain it. No, no I didn't. And I specifically said this WASN'T the case. No aliens here. 'feminist ideology' is pretty much a meaningless thing to say... so yeah, there's nothing TO import. It is only conservatives who think saying 'the feminists think/say...' means a damn thing. I'm not saying you lack anything. And go ahead and reject 'feminist' for yourself. Just stop falsely defining ittttttttt. -_- Anyway. (Sorry, OT. ^^ But seriously, stop contradicting every thing I've ever read on the subject of what feminism is and I'll leave you alone.) Ooooor, you can stop contradicting all the stuff I read, and I'll leave you alone. But you won't, because fundamentally my charge is correct: You said marxism was lacking, therefore there is something it lacks which you want to bring into it. Anything you add will have by definition a non-proletarian character.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 06, 2009 10:38 pm
Louis-Auguste Robespierre Ooooor, you can stop contradicting all the stuff I read, and I'll leave you alone. But you won't, because fundamentally my charge is correct: You said marxism was lacking, therefore there is something it lacks which you want to bring into it. Anything you add will have by definition a non-proletarian character.*is still waiting for any sources on this claim* Also, stop saying things you think I said. -_- I know what the problem is: you 1. listen to what I said, but then 2. don't think about how I am using 'feminism' and apply what I said to your own definition and therein lies the problem. Then you jump to conclusions about what I said, even after I specifically say I didn't...you continue to insist I did because that's the way you interpreted it when you first heard it. edit: Bah, nevermind. I've just encountered an ideological blockage in you. Just...forget it. Honestly.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 06, 2009 11:54 pm
Comrade Kotka Louis-Auguste Robespierre Ooooor, you can stop contradicting all the stuff I read, and I'll leave you alone. But you won't, because fundamentally my charge is correct: You said marxism was lacking, therefore there is something it lacks which you want to bring into it. Anything you add will have by definition a non-proletarian character.*is still waiting for any sources on this claim* Also, stop saying things you think I said. -_- I know what the problem is: you 1. listen to what I said, but then 2. don't think about how I am using 'feminism' and apply what I said to your own definition and therein lies the problem. Then you jump to conclusions about what I said, even after I specifically say I didn't...you continue to insist I did because that's the way you interpreted it when you first heard it. edit: Bah, nevermind. I've just encountered an ideological blockage in you. Just...forget it. Honestly. You said that marxism provided an inadequate or incomplete explanation for women's oppression. True [-] False[-] This is what it hinges on, not the word feminism. If marxism is inadequate or incomplete, you have to go OUTSIDE it, to NON-MARXIST sources to get a more adequate or more complete explanation of women's oppression. THAT is what I am opposed to. But hey what do I matter right? i am just some ******** Trot, eh. I oppose what you you propose and I suddenly have an ideological blockage. Because it couldn't possibly be that everything I have read has said the opposite could it? Not at all. I don't go to uni, so all the stuff I read is for stupid people who don't matter and can be easily dismissed as 'ideologically blocked.' Isn't that the case? I am just some dumb non-university educated worker and so nothing I say that you disagree with can have any logical or rational foundation but must come from being stubborn and ******** dumb.If that is the case, what are you even doing claiming communism, the ideology of the working class?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jul 07, 2009 12:20 am
Okay. To avoid repetition and circles, I'll come from another angle. Louis-Auguste Robespierre You said that marxism provided an inadequate or incomplete explanation for women's oppression. True [-] False[-] This is what it hinges on, not the word feminism. If marxism is inadequate or incomplete, you have to go OUTSIDE it, to NON-MARXIST sources to get a more adequate or more complete explanation of women's oppression. THAT is what I am opposed to. This (the second bit) implies that Marxists should not interrogate their own theory and assumptions, and if that's the case, how is that theory supposed to develop and be tested? If Marxism is supposed to be complete - why are there so many different 'kinds' of Marxism? Orthodoxy is claimed by many different groups, depending on their interpretations. Leninist, Trotskyist, Stalinist (hey, keeping thread relevance here), Gramscian, Althusserian - you name it. How can you prove yours is the 'complete' Marxism that doesn't need to go 'outside', if you don't self-reflexively examine your own theory for holes, according to historical developments? And speaking of which, depending on what 'kind' of Marxist you are, you presumably subscribe to either dialectical materialism, or historical materialism - whichever one it is, they are both about developments and changes over time, and the reconciliation of opposites or differences - how can that be achieved without going 'outside' Marxism? 'Feminist' describes the specific aspect that this group is using to supplement the theory. That is, a more in-depth analysis of the oppression of women using the tools of Marxism. Louis-Auguste Robespierre But hey what do I matter right? i am just some ******** Trot, eh. I oppose what you you propose and I suddenly have an ideological blockage. Because it couldn't possibly be that everything I have read has said the opposite could it? Not at all. I don't go to uni, so all the stuff I read is for stupid people who don't matter and can be easily dismissed as 'ideologically blocked.' Isn't that the case? I am just some dumb non-university educated worker and so nothing I say that you disagree with can have any logical or rational foundation but must come from being stubborn and ******** dumb.If that is the case, what are you even doing claiming communism, the ideology of the working class? As for this... you know all that is bullshit. I've already told you I don't think you're dumb. You told me you thought you were dumb and I told you I don't believe a word of it. (AND you've yet to me all the things you've read, just presupposed that I wouldn't even read them.)
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jul 07, 2009 1:12 am
No. What I was trying to point out were your ******** semantics. You were so ******** literal on the term "Feminism" that failed to comprehend the fact that it had a different meaning when put in front of "Marxism". In this misinterpretation, You proceeded to attack the idea of any agitation for the fact that it turns the class question into a gender question. It is as Kotka said earlier. The Feminists Marxists feel there is a lacking in Marxism that pertains to women. In this they fill that void and use Marxism to explain woman's exploitation under capitalism. Women (as you've said yourself) are the oppressed gender in modern-bourgeois society. Because of this, there arose Feminist-Marxism! Now the gist i get from your fervent defense against Feminist-Marxism only led me to the conclusion that you feel Feminist Agitation is not necessary for class struggle. You however contradicted this conclusion of mine by stating that It is in fact a necessary part of struggle. The difference in our views lies in how important or how far a party must go for feminist agitation. I'm not sure what the racial climate is in Australia, however My theory is: in a immigrant country such as America, there needs to be sub sects of a party dedicated to Major ethnic groups and women, and bring to these races the answer to their oppression being socialism. The reason for this is to play off of the bourgeois- ideology of Racism and focus it in a positive way that both degenerates racism and agitates these races to come together under the common banner of Marxism. These sects would work under the main party which focuses on strictly proletarian revolution, and Marxist ideology.
IN CONCLUSION
Gracchvs stop BAWWing you're not stupid and I am nothing like M-Mann so ******** YOU!
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jul 07, 2009 4:55 pm
Comrade Rob I am nothing like M-Mann so ******** YOU! Goooooood, let the hate flow through you! I'm gonna ignore that fact that hurts though and just plan retribution on everyone in this thread but Kotka secretly.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 08, 2009 1:35 am
Comrade Mann Comrade Rob I am nothing like M-Mann so ******** YOU! Goooooood, let the hate flow through you! I'm gonna ignore that fact that hurts though and just plan retribution on everyone in this thread but Kotka secretly. The retribution has already begun. You think about that. Also, if i hurt you I apologize. The truth is I miss you deeply. Why don't you talk to us anymore :[
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 08, 2009 6:03 am
Louis-Auguste Robespierre If that is the case, what are you even doing claiming communism, the ideology of the working class? I'm intelligentsia. I'm allowed do that. twisted Also, I'm a douchebag, so I'm still allowed to do that. lol
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 08, 2009 6:57 am
Comrade Rob Comrade Mann Comrade Rob I am nothing like M-Mann so ******** YOU! Goooooood, let the hate flow through you! I'm gonna ignore that fact that hurts though and just plan retribution on everyone in this thread but Kotka secretly. The retribution has already begun. You think about that. Also, if i hurt you I apologize. The truth is I miss you deeply. Why don't you talk to us anymore :[ I live in a place without Internet is why. Also my numerous personas on the NCS chat are banned by Gracchvs.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 08, 2009 7:29 pm
Comrade Mann I live in a place without Internet is why. Also my numerous personas on the NCS chat are banned by Gracchvs. If they were the random trolls that refused to identify themselves, I banned some too. Sorry, but whose fault is that?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 08, 2009 7:34 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 8:38 pm
I actually agree with Comrade Rob on this one. There seems to be a lot of animosity here, and that probably needs to be addressed for the issues that plague the guild to be fixed. It seems that when an issue is raised, Either Gracchvs or Comrade Mann start a personal fight over it. That's childish, immature, and counter-productive. I'm going to go right out and say it: cut the bull s**t guys, we need to work together on this. Right now, two of the most prolific posters are sitting and whining at each other like little babies and it makes me sick. Cut it out.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 8:58 pm
Herobane I actually agree with Comrade Rob on this one. There seems to be a lot of animosity here, and that probably needs to be addressed for the issues that plague the guild to be fixed. It seems that when an issue is raised, Either Gracchvs or Comrade Mann start a personal fight over it. That's childish, immature, and counter-productive. I'm going to go right out and say it: cut the bull s**t guys, we need to work together on this. Right now, two of the most prolific posters are sitting and whining at each other like little babies and it makes me sick. Cut it out. I was talking about the hostility of Kot towards Mann. But that was because of Mann's hostility toward Gracchvs. Anyway. Let them quarrel. One of them will kill each other with an ice-axe eventually.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|