|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 4:27 pm
The only thing I have heard is that the last word in the book is "scar"
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2006 11:21 pm
DramaKing93 The only thing I have heard is that the last word in the book is "scar" I haven't really heard a thing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 4:13 pm
Mametto DramaKing93 The only thing I have heard is that the last word in the book is "scar" I haven't really heard a thing. Yeah the "scar" thing is true....I keep wondering (well, we all are obviously) what happens in the book that would make the last word be "scar". I'm kind of scared, also. That Harry will die, I mean. Either way, i'll cry my eyes out because the series will still be over whether he "lives" or not. stressed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2006 9:16 pm
CrazyMuggleGirl Mametto DramaKing93 The only thing I have heard is that the last word in the book is "scar" I haven't really heard a thing. Yeah the "scar" thing is true....I keep wondering (well, we all are obviously) what happens in the book that would make the last word be "scar". I'm kind of scared, also. That Harry will die, I mean. Either way, i'll cry my eyes out because the series will still be over whether he "lives" or not. stressed How can a story end with the word scar can you think of a sentence that would make any sense with word scar at the end, really how credible is that? Please state your sources.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 25, 2006 1:58 pm
I think That Harry is the seventh horcrux
ideas to back it up: Harry and Dumbledore could not find the seventh horcrux and it would be a perfect ending to the series if, Harry had to murder himself, to save his freinds, or to have his friend or friends kill him for the sake of everyone.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 25, 2006 5:01 pm
CrazyMuggleGirl I knew that R.A.B. was Regulus Black the first time I saw the initials on the letter in the book. Has anyone else realised that J.K. mentions (not directly) Sirius' brother about 4 times in the first 10 chapters? I noticed immediatly and I smelled foreshadowing. (laughs) First of all, Regulus says in the letter (assuming that the writer IS Regulus) that he "Discovered Voldemort's secret." I think that Voldemort made HARRY into a Horcrux, and he dosen't want to KILL Harry, but USE him to become even more immortal. Regulus also writes "I face death in the hope that when you meet your match, you will be mortal once more." Obviously, HARRY is Voldemort's match, and Regulus must have chickened out of helping Voldemort, that's why he wanted him to be "mortal once more." That's also why Voldemort must have killed Regulus. Plus he destroyed the real Horcrux, so more proof that he wanted Voldemort to become mortal again." Now, that isn't exactly the case. As far as we know, Regulus(or someone else, I'm not really sure it's him) he may have SWITCHED the horcrux with the fake locket. Check book 5, page 116, the bottom paragraph. wink
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 25, 2006 5:07 pm
Emerald_Jasmine Floating around somewhere on the Harry Potter subforum (and the internet at large) is a theory that makes more and more sense the more I think about it. It states that the living chess game in the first book is a code for how the armies are going to work out. I don't remember everything, but the Death Eaters are the white pieces and the good wizards are the black pieces. Cedric is represented by the first black pawn "killed". This pawn is "killed" by a white pawn (Wormtail). Sirius is one of the black Knights. The white queen is either Narcissa or Bellatrix. Ron as the other knight (and the male closest to Harry even before Sirius or Dumbledore) gets clocked by the white queen to clear the path for Harry to take the white king, leading us to conclude that he is either killed or severely injured so that Harry can defeat Voldemort. Now to add my own little spin: Obviously, Voldemort is the white king, but who is the black king? One might say that the entire theory can be discounted because Dumbledore is the obvious choice for the black king. BUT my theory is that Arthur Weasley is the king. We've had a lot of hints that he should be more powerful in the ministry than he is, and in the "Weasley is our King" song, it never specifies which Weasley (making it a handy foreshadowing device). Plus, out of all the Order of Pheonix fathers (Harry's, Neville's, and the Weasley's) he's the only one to remain intact. I think that he becomes MoM, or at least very prominent in the war. Wow. That has certainly never reached my ears or eyes, but that is the best theory I have ever heard! That's really cool! biggrin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 15, 2006 7:24 pm
What would happen if NEVILLE actually killed Voldemort? That would be a nice twist, and it would show that even the "weak" people can be strong. It would be a cool ending also if Draco went to the good side, and maybe helped Harry kill Voldemort? Not too likely, but it would be cool. Anyways, I just think that Harry will sacrifice himself to save the wizarding world and save his friends and Ginny. But he would kill Voldemort when he sacrifices himself somehow. ninja
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 08, 2006 8:38 am
2)that Harry, or his scar, IS a horcux (sp?).
To back it up: as it states in the 5th book, "a date of death (some 15 years ago) followed the date of birth" refering to the tapestry in the Black house. Now correct me if im wrong, but was Harry about 15 or 14 in that book? His parents were killed, as we all know, when he was very young. Was it possible that in fact, Voldemort realised that the horcux (sp?) was gone and tried to make another. Just to kill two birds with one stone, he would also kill the boy mentioned in the section of the profecy (sp?). Mabie he tried to make a horcux (sp?) by killing Harry. That would explain how he has some hint of Voldemort's power and can feel what he feels. Could it be, that in that last bit of life, as a desperate attempt to survive, he used the soul that split by killing Harry's parents and made a horcux out of the scar?
I find this theory quite a lot and frankly it angers me. Its dosnt make logical sense. Dumberdore said that to make a horcrux you had to use quite a bit of dark magic and we all know the dark lord is capable of. But why would he do that. He came into Godrics Hollow planning on killing the potters that much we are sure of. So why would he atempt (sp?..ok i know that wrong but you get my gist) to make some one he tried to kill into a horcrux if the horcrux died then so would he. Also becaus the locket was not destroyed he would not need to make another. As far as Voldermort knew the locket was locked up real safe. Also we were led to believe that a horcrux takes time to make. Once he was defeated i dont beleive that he had the strenght to make another.
My personal theory that i just came up with is this, When Voldermort came to Godrics Hollow he told Lily to "step aside" why wouldnt the Dark Lord kill a muggle born just to simply kill a muggel born? Why wouldnt he just kill her. Unless he was on a "time constrante" What if instead of trying to kill Harry he was trying to kidnap him. And once he had him, raise him to be like tha Dark lord so Voldermort himself could use "The power the Dark Lord knows not"
oh and in refrenct to RAB JKR has said in many interviews that she didnt mean to put RAB in there as a gussing game she tyhought she made it clear who RAB was and didnt need to expand on it but now everyone has all of these theorys but the main one is spot on. Which i took to mean its Regulas. Plus when i read it i actuall read Reguals Black I didnt read RAB, tricky mind
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 08, 2006 8:41 am
Talen Lestrange "To disprove it:what about the profecy (sp?)? It states that "one cant live while the other survives" wouldn't IF THIS IS TRUE be the oppisite? If Harry lives, wouldn't Volemort? As long as he is a horcux then Voldemort would live on...you know unless Harry gouges his scar off his face and i dought that would make a pretty picture for readers. " And once again, I counter this argument with this: I don't think by 'live' the prophecy ment 'surviving' or else it would just say 'one cant survive while the other does'. The phrophecy , as J.K said, and as those of us who write and read a lot know, are always worded so carefuly that each word choice may come down to a specific meaning. Getting back to what I said, I think by Live, the phrophecy ment live without constantly having the weight of something down your back. Lets take Harry First: Is he really 'living'? He always has to worry about Who Voldemort may kill next, and when he may come after him. His whole life has now become devoted to killing Voldemort. He even gave up Ginny for the cause.... Now Voldemort: He can not be all powerful, he can not rest, until he kills this boy that has thwarted him so many times... True, the two are surviving, but neither can really get on with their lives while the other is alive. that is ecactly what i thought the profecy meant thak you for laying ti out
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
