|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Mar 10, 2009 12:44 am
There's a lot to be said about the recent movie, Watchmen, so people who have seen and plan to see it can talk about it here! If you need a place to start: comparisons to the graphic novel? (I've never read the graphic novel, so that'd be fun to read.) Favorite moments, things that you didn't like? What profound meanings did you find in it? And because it probably deserves its own topic with you guys (or at least its own role in the end credits), what are your thoughts on Dr. Manhattan's p***s? (I actually thought his nudity was much more artistic and effective than him in his underwear.) Finally, I leave you with this little bit of background from Wikipedia that I liked. There may be spoilers, so don't read ahead if you haven't read the graphic novel or watched the movie.Wikipedia Moore used the story as a means to reflect contemporary anxieties and to deconstruct the superhero concept. Watchmen takes place in an alternate history United States where superheroes emerged in the 1940s and 1960s, helping the United States to win the Vietnam War. The country is edging closer to a nuclear war with the Soviet Union, freelance costumed vigilantes have been outlawed and most costumed superheroes are in retirement or working for the government. The story focuses on the personal development and struggles of the protagonists as an investigation into the murder of a government sponsored superhero pulls them out of retirement and eventually leads them to confront a plot by one of their own to stave off nuclear war by killing millions of innocent people. P.S. Sorry for the lame post, guys - it's late and I'm tired, but I wanted this thread to be available!
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Mar 10, 2009 4:53 am
Out of curiosity, those of you that have watched it, have you seen an irate nerd shout "WHERE THE ******** IS THE SQUID?" or something similar near the end? I'm hoping this happens somewhere.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Mar 10, 2009 4:59 am
As per the movie itself, I thought it was visually stunning, but lacking in life. Don't get me wrong, the performances of the actor's were fine (particularly Jon and Rorschach, although I'd have gone a different route for Adrian.) But I'm not sure it worked as a movie unto itself. Its flaws I feel were remaining too faithful to the graphic novel in some areas while choosing to excise other more characterful bits for gratuitous violence, sex and seemingly arbitrary changes. It didn't work enough with its medium. It was a half step removed from the animated motion comics they just put out...it's almost like explaining a joke and its punchline instead of actually telling it. If I had never read the novel, I'd have zero emotional investment in any of the characters. Everything just sort of...skimmed the surface. I mean, they were more than cutouts in the film but they were all built on a basic cliche and it didn't do much to make me feel otherwise. The closest they came were Rorschach and Blake. My absolute favorite part of the movie was the opening montage, because Snyder actually makes it a film then instead of a moving book. Wonderful cinematic interpretation of the Minutemen material. And a favorite cameo.  Note Thomas, Martha, and Alfred in the background exiting the Gotham Opera. And oh yeah, where the ******** is the squid? (yes, I know it's in the director's cut. uneth will get this.)
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Mar 10, 2009 5:02 am
unethikul Out of curiosity, those of you that have watched it, have you seen an irate nerd shout "WHERE THE ******** IS THE SQUID?" or something similar near the end? I'm hoping this happens somewhere. You did this I was typing up my own reply, b*****d. Couldn't have waited 5 minutes? xp And no, no squid yelling. Although I did kick someone in the head and tell them to shut the ******** up after the nth time laughing at Manhattan's p***s. Yes, I realize you're too fat to see your own anymore so you think the novelty of one is funny. I still paid $10 to see this damn movie without your flab-jiggling chortle.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Mar 10, 2009 4:01 pm
I think one of my favorite things about the movie was all the tiny little details that fans of the graphic novel would pick up on. There were so many little things in the sets and silly little additions (Ozy's "boys" folder in his hidden files, Captain Metropolis and Hooded Justice appear to be flirting with each other at Sally's retirement in the opening credits, Ozy's plan being titled S.Q.U.I.D to make up for the lack of squid, etc.)
I don't think the movie was perfect, but I wasn't expecting it to be. I did love it, though and I'm eager to see it again.
From an objective movie-goer's standpoint it was just alright. The pacing felt a bit odd and I wasn't entirely happy with a few of the performances (Silk Spectre II and Ozy in particular who I don't remember who played them), but Jackie Earle Haley and Jeffrey Dean Morgan (Rorschach and The Comedian respectively) were so perfectly cast and perfectly performed I felt it made up for it.
From my personal fangirl point of view I liked how closely it stuck to the source material and most of the changes worked for the film. A couple changes I wasn't happy about were the delivery of Silk Spectre II's paternal revelations on Mars, leaving out what happened to Hollis, and how Rorschach disposed of the kidnapper. For the most part the changes were minor and I saw no problem with them.
I was worried I was going to hate it. I was worried it wouldn't be able to translate to film at all. I was worried Zack Snyder was going to overuse slow-motion effects ala 300. I was pleasantly surprised to find that, while there was some slow-motion, it wasn't used to the point it felt tired and pointless. It worked rather well for most parts, in my opinion.
And those opening credits were probably the most fantastic opening credits I've seen for any film ever. They were just so visually stunning, perfectly executed, and set the scene so well.
BLAHBLAHBLAH I HAVE LOTS MORE TO SAY BUT TL;DR THERE WERE SOME PROBLEMS BUT OVERALL I QUITE ENJOYED IT
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Mar 10, 2009 4:05 pm
reddy2bplayd and how Rorschach disposed of the kidnapper. Agreed. The comic's version was subtler, and more knife-twisting than CHOP YOU IN THE HEAD FIVE TIMES!!! I blame Saw for the change.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Mar 10, 2009 4:13 pm
kissmekillme reddy2bplayd and how Rorschach disposed of the kidnapper. Agreed. The comic's version was subtler, and more knife-twisting than CHOP YOU IN THE HEAD FIVE TIMES!!! I blame Saw for the change. And him CHOPPING THE GUY IN THE HEAD FIVE TIMES!!! made it seem more of a RAAAAAGE thing, not a "hurr I just lost what shreds of sanity my mother didn't take from me and now I feel nothing for scum like you! n 3n" thing.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Mar 10, 2009 6:07 pm
As people who didn't read the graphic novel (though I just downloaded it and shall be starting on it soon :B) my boyfriend and I definitely picked up on Rorschach's hesitation, before he killed the kidnapper. Perhaps the actor just performed the scene very well, but even though I couldn't see Rorschach's face, I felt like there was betrayal in his expression. He didn't seem mad; he seemed like he numbed out and lost all faith in humanity. So don't worry - even though the comic probably communicated it much better, I don't think the idea was completely lost upon an innocent audience. :3
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Mar 10, 2009 6:38 pm
Waltz for Luma As people who didn't read the graphic novel (though I just downloaded it and shall be starting on it soon :B) my boyfriend and I definitely picked up on Rorschach's hesitation, before he killed the kidnapper. Perhaps the actor just performed the scene very well, but even though I couldn't see Rorschach's face, I felt like there was betrayal in his expression. He didn't seem mad; he seemed like he numbed out and lost all faith in humanity. So don't worry - even though the comic probably communicated it much better, I don't think the idea was completely lost upon an innocent audience. :3 Well that's good to know! Maybe it's just that in comparison with how it was done originally it seemed angry, and I couldn't put myself out of the "I know what happens" mindset enough to have judged it as a standalone.
I'm glad that it came across right for you two (and hopefully other people who didn't read it before seeing the movie).
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 11, 2009 3:49 am
Well, apparently when the explosion goes off, if you look carefully at the screen, it says SQUID, so the squid was kinda still there haha. Either way I wasn't so disappointed at the lack of squid because I knew it wasn't going to be there, but the squid would have added another layer of humor and satire in there. I mean, you're destroying a city with a squid. It doesn't get much weirder than that.
I expected Rorschach to look more MAD Magazine-guy ugly, but I liked how he came out and it fit very well.
Though they cut out a lot, I really enjoyed the nods to the original graphic novel, like you'll see the guys from the news stand when the bomb goes off and such. But I still liked the graphic novel better. I just had far too high expectations for the film...
Well... we'll have to have this discussion again when the four-hour version comes out.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 11, 2009 7:45 am
I haven't seen it or read the graphic novel, but I totally want to see it. I don't care if I don't understand it, it LOOKS so amazing, and I'm such a sucker for the aesthetic of things, I have to go.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 11, 2009 9:50 am
We get to see Doctor Manhattan Fanservice? whee
I'm one of the "read the comic over and over" people, but considering that the comic was done in 1987, it was fair to say that there were going to be some drastic modifications that needed to be made and such (like Nixon not being the president and so on). I think the people who did "V for Vendetta" also noticed this, and they did a smack-on job in changing details and plot points and still keeping the spirit of the original work intact.
Needless to say, I am glad to hear that there would be no psychically-charged pseudo-alien squid suddenly teleporting involved in this movie, and will get around to seeing it soon.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 11, 2009 10:03 am
RyanJakobi We get to see Doctor Manhattan Fanservice? whee I'm one of the "read the comic over and over" people, but considering that the comic was done in 1987, it was fair to say that there were going to be some drastic modifications that needed to be made and such (like Nixon not being the president and so on). I think the people who did "V for Vendetta" also noticed this, and they did a smack-on job in changing details and plot points and still keeping the spirit of the original work intact. Needless to say, I am glad to hear that there would be no psychically-charged pseudo-alien squid suddenly teleporting involved in this movie, and will get around to seeing it soon. ...yeah, Nixon is still the president. It's a period piece. Set in 85. Greatest year ever. Also, the squid works SO much better than the Manhattan ending. The beauty of the Squid is that it needs to be an external threat, The Other. Something completely alien for the world to rally against. While Osterman may no longer be human, he's still very much associated with America and collateral damage to American property or not it stretches disbelief to breaking to think that the Russians would just let that slip. Not to mention, the death of the squid gives hope that a united Earth front will be able to defeat the feared future invasion. Even if America and the Soviets united, everything they showed in the film gives no indication that they'd think they could do a damn thing to Jon. So what's the point?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Mar 12, 2009 3:33 pm
kissmekillme RyanJakobi We get to see Doctor Manhattan Fanservice? whee I'm one of the "read the comic over and over" people, but considering that the comic was done in 1987, it was fair to say that there were going to be some drastic modifications that needed to be made and such (like Nixon not being the president and so on). I think the people who did "V for Vendetta" also noticed this, and they did a smack-on job in changing details and plot points and still keeping the spirit of the original work intact. Needless to say, I am glad to hear that there would be no psychically-charged pseudo-alien squid suddenly teleporting involved in this movie, and will get around to seeing it soon. ...yeah, Nixon is still the president. It's a period piece. Set in 85. Greatest year ever. Also, the squid works SO much better than the Manhattan ending. The beauty of the Squid is that it needs to be an external threat, The Other. Something completely alien for the world to rally against. While Osterman may no longer be human, he's still very much associated with America and collateral damage to American property or not it stretches disbelief to breaking to think that the Russians would just let that slip. Not to mention, the death of the squid gives hope that a united Earth front will be able to defeat the feared future invasion. Even if America and the Soviets united, everything they showed in the film gives no indication that they'd think they could do a damn thing to Jon. So what's the point? Ozy at least had the technology that duplicated his energy... And they knew how to block his future-seeing stuff. He's made from science gone awry, they could possibly get science to figure it out. ? Who knows... I enjoyed it, though. 3 hours, it felt right, and everything... I really, really hate when movies feel rushed. But this felt like a story. A real story. I don't know what Ozy was suppose to be like... ...but by the end, I liked him. Sort of boyish super mind and ultra speed. Catching the bullet made me lol. And yes, Rorschach made me think he was hesitating to kill that guy. Doubts everywhere, but when he did it, he did it... and that was it. Disconnection. I could feel that the entire rest of the movie. =O
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Mar 13, 2009 4:43 pm
As someone who never read the graphic novel and never really felt any need to, I really think I could have liked this movie were it not so over the top. I think it had a lot of really great social commentary and interesting things to say. But, I think most of that was lost in the blood and guts and naked in an attempt to court the college-aged male who thought 300 was "totally freaking badass, man!"
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|